American Journal of Transplantation (June '05) includes a fascinating study by Sydney Halpern and others at Penn in which a study of 347 surgeons revealed that there is some discrimination against those with HIV in terms of who gets an organ, and the reasons don't make sense in clinical terms.
The 347
surgeons (56.1%) returning completed questionnaires believed that
HCV- and
HIV-infected patients have similar post-transplant survival (p =
0.9), but
that both groups fare worse than HBV-infected patients (p < 0.00001
for both
comparisons). Most transplant surgeons considered HBV- and HCV-
infected
patients to be appropriate transplantation candidates (p = 1.0 for
this
comparison), whereas one-third considered HIV-infected patients to be
appropriate candidates (p < 0.00001 when compared with HBV- or HCV-
infected
patients). That surgeons are generally willing to transplant HCV-
infected
patients but not HIV-infected patients, and yet believe these
groups will
have similar post-transplant survival, suggests that survival
estimates
alone do not explain surgeons' choices. HIV-infected patients
should have
equal access to organs unless or until evidence emerges that they fare
substantially worse than other potential recipients.
[thanks Sean Philpott]